Land of the NOT so Free – Devastating Consequences to US ALL

Steven Ratner – A Liberal writer – even confirms that there will be DEATH PANELS in Obama-Health Scare Law in New York Times

If you want to make choices for you and your health Care options and not the
government, PLEASE Vote AGAINST OBAMA. We certainly won’t get everything we want right now, but in my humble opinion, Romney & Paul Ryan are SERIOUS about turning the ship around!

These 2 have more than enough years of creating jobs & financial experience, compassion, and in spite of the lies of the lame liberal news media, these 2 WILL work with everyone to REPEAL this devastating law, among other things.

Some quick history – OBAMA’S ECONOMY Jan 2009 ’til NOW
Gas prices in ’08: $1.78 a gal avg under Bush – Now averaging $4.00 a gallon under Obama. Household income is down $4,000, our healthcare premiums have risen upwards of $2500 per person, home values have kept a downward trend, the country has over 16 trillion deficit and climbing, gross domestic product is down from 1.7 to 1.3, and Obama wants to let the Bush tax cuts expire for EVERYONE, even though he says that he won’t, and to just give him ‘more time’ to transform our great country. (What the bleep?)

Our Military men & women are losing their lives overseas because the GREEN blooded radical Muslims who we trained on their soil are turning around & stabbing OUR fighters in the backs! The world is on fire almost everywhere you look, and you don’t have to look very far, because there is unrest in our own backyards.

The Tea Party & Conservative candidates in ALL national level races (and those currently serving) are being demonized by the left like never before, and no one bothers to call them out on their lies & spin! (except for other conservatives)

I guarantee you there will be crushing taxes come January 2013, for richer or poorer, in sickness and in health. We are already seeing GROCERY PRICES go through the roof because everything trickles down to us.

We have a lame-news media (MSNBC, CNN, ABC) who deny & LIE through their damn teeth every single day! Their agenda is CRYSTAL clear. We MUST keep waking up our friends & family to these fakes.

Does all of this (above) sound like something you want to all put up with? Hell NO! Had enough yet? YES.

SOLUTION – Please VOTE Romney / Ryan Nov 6, 2012 to HELP begin once more, to SAVE OUR precious land of the FREE & HOME of the BRAVE! Tell ALL your friends, NEIGHBORS, family, and colleagues!! This crap must NOT be allowed to happen any longer.


Did you hear what happened at a Florida college last week?

Fri, Sept 28, 2012
Did you hear what happened at a Florida college last week?


Dear Fellow American,

Did you hear the outrageous story last week of a Florida algebra professor who forced her students to sign a pledge promising to vote for President Obama and Democratic candidates “up and down the ticket”?

This story was picked up by the Drudge Report, was carried by radio hosts Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck, and covered nationally on outlets ranging from FOX News to Comedy Central.

But what you might not know is that this egregious incident would never have been exposed if it weren’t for one man – a Florida resident and ordinary citizen, Richard Swier – who broke the story as a part of the Franklin Center’s Citizen Watchdog initiative. Because of Richard’s great work, the professor has been suspended without pay and is under investigation.

I’m writing to tell you about this because taking back the media is critical to taking back our country. Citizen Journalism is transforming our media and political landscape – and in order to succeed, we need YOU to take action. Please click here to learn how you can get involved and make a difference!

There are three things that you can do right now, joining with the Citizen Watchdog team, to stand up and make a difference:

1) Forward this email to as many friends, family, neighbors, and coworkers as possible, and encourage them to get involved as a part of this important effort!

2) Sign up and become a part of our Citizen Watchdog initiative by clicking here. We provide training, tools, and resources to empower thousands of citizens across America to tell the stories that the mainstream media won’t.

3) Donate to support our Citizen Watchdog efforts. It’s only through the generous support of great Americans like you that we’re able to keep this program moving forward. Your donation will help support training and resources for our army of citizen activists. Please click here to make a contribution!

Time and time again, we’ve seen the power of citizen journalism – whether it’s with the downfall of Dan Rather from the helm of CBS News, the federal defunding of ACORN, or the countless examples that are happening each and every day because of citizens like you.

Richard is one among thousands of volunteer activists who have signed up as part of the Franklin Center’s Citizen Watchdog team. He is a living example of how ordinary citizens can achieve extraordinary things. Join Richard and answer the call to hold our local, state, and federal governments accountable. We are leading an investigative crusade of public integrity. Click here to get started!

For Liberty,

-The Citizen Watchdog Team

If you believe in our mission of creating a network of citizen watchdogs across our country who will hold their government accountable, please join our efforts, or consider making a financial donation, by clicking here.

Good article by Dinesh D’Souza

Subject: Will Obama succeed in creating a United States of Islam? By Dinesh D’Souza
Sept 21, 2012

Something very big is going on in the Middle East. This is not about an inflammatory film or a political assassination in Libya. Rather, recent events confirm that throughout the Muslim world, radical Islam is on the march. The radical Muslims have figured out a much better strategy than the Al Qaeda strategy of the past decade. Instead of terrorist acts aimed at directly wounding the “far enemy,” namely the United States, Islamic radicals are using democracy and public protest to defeat the “near enemy,” namely their own autocratic governments, and seize power.

Remarkably President Obama seems to be responding in a way that helps the Islamic radicals, and the vital question is why. To understand Obama, we need to back up and observe his Middle East policy
since he took office in early 2009. There is a weird double standard in the way that President Obama has been acting in region. In Libya, he used force to prevent "genocide" but he has refused to use force to prevent much greater genocide in Syria. What makes Obama’s conduct especially odd is that he undertook Libyan military intervention after a civil struggle in which Muammar Qaddafi had killed around 250 people. In Syria, however, tens of thousands have been killed by the regime and still Obama refuses to use direct military force.

A similar inconsistency defines Obama’s actions in Egypt and Iran. In Egypt, Obama used diplomatic pressure to oust the Egyptian dictator Hosni Mubarak, clearing the way for the Islamic radicals, led by the Muslim Brotherhood, to win the subsequent parliamentary and presidential elections. Using the

rhetoric of democracy, Obama allied himself in Egypt with the democracy protesters.

Yet when there were equally massive demonstrations in Iran a year and a half earlier, aimed at ousting the regime of the mullahs, Obama urged caution and restraint. He refused to embrace the protesters. Essentially he did nothing. Eventually the Iranian police crushed the uprising and the Iranian rebellion dissolved.

So we have a dual anomaly here. How can we explain why Obama uses force here but not there, getting rid of one ruler but keeping others in place? Even now Obama’s conduct in response to the latest Muslim agitation is ambiguous. Far from standing up forthrightly for American interests, Obama seems equally resolute in protecting the reputation of the Islamic agitators and their newly-installed leaders.

To date, the best attempt to account for Obama’s strange conduct is Walter Russell Mead’s theory that Obama is "the least competent manager of America’s Middle East diplomatic portfolio." In other words, Obama is an amateur and a bungler. Mead notes that "he has committed our forces in the strategically irrelevant backwater of Libya," that he has "strained our ties with the established regimes without winning new friends on the Arab street" and that he has "infuriated and frustrated long-term friends but made no headway in reconciling enemies."

But surely Obama knows that Libya is strategically irrelevant; surely he can see that he is antagonizing America’s friends and strengthening America’s enemies. So Mead’s analysis begs the question: why would Obama continue to act this way when the results are as obvious to him as to Mead and the rest of us?

I believe I can answer these questions and explain Obama’s double standards. The key is to realize that Obama isn’t a fool. He isn’t getting results opposite to the ones he intends; rather, he intends the results he’s getting. He said during his inaugural speech that he wanted to remake America and transform its place in the world, and this is exactly what he is doing.

Obama’s is an anti-colonialist, an ideology he adopted from his Kenyan father. Recall that Obama’s autobiography is titled "Dreams From My Father." In that book, Obama details how he got his aspirations, his values, even his core identity, from his absentee father. In a sample passage, Obama writes, "It was into my father’s image, the black man, son of Africa, that I’d packed all the attributes I sought in myself."

While anti-colonialism may be an unfamiliar word to many Americans, it is a very popular ideology even today in Asia, Africa, South America, and the Middle East. Anti-colonialism is the doctrine that holds that America and the West are the rogue nations of the world. Having adopted his father’s anti-colonial way of thinking, President Obama has oriented his foreign policy not so much toward containing Iran or North Korea but rather toward containing America.

I’m not suggesting Obama is a traitor, that he hates America, or that he’s anti-American. Rather, he subscribes to an ideology that considers it a good thing for America’s influence to be reduced. Obama wants to reduce America’s footprint in the world because he believes we have been stepping on the world.

How is Obama doing this? Two dictators are out–Qaddafi and Mubarak–and two dictatorial regimes–that of Assad in Syria and the mullahs in Iran–remain in power. What do Qaddafi and Mubarak have in common? They were both doing business with America. Mubarak was America’s most reliable ally in the region, not counting Israel. Qaddafi was not exactly an ally, but he had been behaving himself since America’s Iraq invasion, outing terrorists, paying reparations for the Lockerbie bombing, and so on.

Now both Qaddafi and Mubarak are gone.

In Libya, it’s hard to say what the new regime will do. We have heard both Islamist rumblings and secular rumblings, and now the Islamic rumblings are getting louder. But undeniably in Egypt, we are seeing the consolidation of a regime that is vastly more anti-American and anti-Israel. It’s important to realize that in Egypt Obama is actively facilitating the rise to power of the Muslim Brotherhood. No one is suggesting that Obama caused the Arab Spring. The Brotherhood won a free election. But now there is a power struggle under way between the Brotherhood and the Egyptian military.

As a recent AP story reported, the Obama administration has been warning the military: step aside and turn over power to the Brotherhood, or America will cut off military and economic aid.

This could be explained as reflecting Obama’s unshakeable commitment to democracy, but this commitment was absent during the massive popular demonstrations in Iran in 2009. Then Obama stayed out, even praising the reaction of the Iranian Supreme Leader, and eventually the democracy movement was crushed. Similarly in Syria, Obama has shown himself clearly reluctant to get involved, providing only modest support to the rebels even in the wake of a massive military crackdown and tens of thousands of casualties.

So Assad continues to hang on, and the mullahs remain secure in power in Iran. What do these regimes have in common? They are both hostile to the United States, and allied with each other in subverting America’s interests in the region. Both are also state sponsors of terrorism. If the regimes in Syria and Iran were to fall, we can’t be sure what would replace them, but we can be reasonably confident that the new governments would be less hostile to America than the ones that are there now.

Thus Obama’s double-standards in the region can be explained by an underlying single-standard. He wants to undermine America’s allies and leave in place regimes that are indifferent or hostile to America. This is what the anti-colonial ideology predicts he would do, and this is what his actions show he is doing. No wonder that in recent days Obama seems more concerned with containing America than with acting decisively against the hostile forces of radical Islam in the Middle East.

Now what? If Obama gets a second term, what might be the next pro-American regime to fall? In my view, Saudi Arabia. If Obama is re-elected he could demand that the Saudi royal family put itself on the ballot against the Muslim Brotherhood. That is an election the Saudi royals would most likely lose. If that happens then the three most important countries in the Middle East (Iran, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia) would all be in the grip of the radical Muslims.

We are seeing in the region a powerful bid for the restoration of Islam as a global power. One Muslim Brotherhood official put it bluntly. What the radical Muslims seek, he said, is "a country called the United States of Islam." Remarkably this radical Muslim dream going back to the 1920’s is now being advanced by President Obama, who seems to think it is somehow consonant with the dream from his father.

Just as history will credit Ronald Reagan with helping to produce the dissolution of the Soviet empire, history might credit Obama with helping to produce the United States of Islam.

Dinesh D’Souza, narrator and co-director of the film "2016: Obama’s America," is the author of the bestselling new book "Obama’s America: Unmaking the American Dream." as well as the President of King’s College.

For more info, visit:

Man-made disasters & cover-ups continue from this Administration

Another "Man Made Disaster" Admin caught in ANOTHER cover-up

Caught Lying Again: Obama Administration deleted State Dept. memo from
Internet after discovering Al-Qaeda, behind Benghazi attack on Sept 26 there were reports that the Obama Admin. found out that Al-Qaeda was behind the Benghazi consulate attacks within 24 hours of the assault that ‘killed’ four Americans. (murder is more like it)

So what did the administration do? Immediately secure the area?

Nope. A week later – FBI arrived at the Embassy. Then the administration at least reported the terror attack was by Al-Qaeda? No!! They blamed it on a stupid immature made U Tube video.

Here’s what they did – They took down a State Dept memo from the internet the very next day.

Wed Sept 12, 2012. Blogger speak with authorization discovered that FIVE days before the 11th. anniversary of 9-11, the US State Dept sent out a memo announcing NO credible security threats (?) against the United States on the anniversary of 9-11. WTF…

Other then having an attack take place on President Obama’s watch there was no conceivable reason for the denials from the Administration, that continue even though the truth is now out.

The Overseas, Security Advisory Council, who posted the memo, is part of the
Bureau of Diplomatic Security under the U.S. Department of State. The OSAC memo said: Terrorism and Important Dates Global 9/6/2012

"OSAC currently has no credible information to suggest that AL-Qa’ida or any

other terrorist group is plotting any kind of attack overseas to coincide
with the upcoming anniversary of September 11."

However, constituents often have concerns around important dates, holidays, and major events, Often times, these concerns are the result of increased media attention to the issue, rather than credible evidence of a terrorist plot.

The memo gone. Convenient. They trashed the memo taking it down from the internet. But once it’s out on the net it’s out there forever. To see the actual memo:

These people are disgusting at best, contemptible at worse. If BHO gets another 4 years, we will NOT survive this assault on OUR Freedom of Speech, WE WILL NOT HAVE SECURE BORDERS, 5 Supreme court Justices could be appointed by Obama, not to mention – the worlds economy (affecting ALL of us with hyperinflation) will spin off into the ozone.

PARTS 1 & 2 of ‘The Project’ TRUE INFO

NOT about politics – more importantly – about safety /security US & abroad

‘The Project’ – 2 part mini-documentary produced by The Blaze TV (GBTV)

Brand NEW – shared on U tube. EXCELLENT info & true info – Please – watch & share

PART 1 (approx 48 min)

PART 2 (approx 43 min)